All Current Affairs
News Of The Day : Panel concerned at CBI vacancies
- January 8, 2019
- Posted by: Shivam
- Category: NEWS Worth To Read
News Of The Day : Panel concerned at CBI vacancies
Shocked’ that Section 66A is still being used, SC seeks Centre’s response
Over three years after it struck down Section 66A of the Information Technology Act as unconstitutional, the Supreme Court on Monday said it was shocked to hear that authorities still continue to book people under the now extinct and draconian provision.
A Bench led by Justice Rohinton F. Nariman, who wrote the judgment in March 2015 upholding online free speech against Section 66A, said “strict action” would follow if the claims in the petition filed by the People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) were found true.
The court ordered the Centre to respond to the petition in four weeks.
The PUCL said Section 66A, which restricted free expression online, continued to survive and occasionally found a place in the FIRs registered by the police in complete contravention of the Supreme Court judgment in the Shreya Singhal case.
The judgment had found that Section 66A was contrary to both Articles 19 (free speech) and 21 (right to life) of the Constitution. The entire provision was struck down by the court.
The petition said the judgment rendered Section 66A extinct from the very date of its insertion into the IT Act, i.e. October 27, 2009.
“Further, the judgment and final order in the Shreya Singhal case had rendered all investigations, prosecutions, and convictions based on Section 66-A IT Act illegal, and it forestalled any use of Section 66-A IT Act after the decision was rendered.
“Despite the clear and unequivocal holding of this court in the Shreya Singhal case, Section 66A of the IT Act continues to be applied in the legal system,” the petition said.
It said a recent working paper by the Internet Freedom Foundation demonstrated that pending prosecutions under Section 66A had not been terminated, and further it continued to be invoked by police across India in FIRs registered after the 2015 judgment.
The petition said there had been a huge communication gap at the ground level and many officials may not even know about the Supreme Court verdict.
It said trial courts and prosecutors were not actively implementing the verdict and the burden of terminating illegal prosecutions based on Section 66A fell on the accused persons.
“Thus, compliance with the Constitution has been made primarily dependent on the means of individual accused persons, potentially rendering justice beyond the reach of accused persons without the means to afford quality legal counsel…It is humbly submitted that the harm emanating from this state of affairs is enormous,” the petition said.
These unwarranted prosecutions amount to wastage of precious public resources in a criminal justice system which is already reeling under heavy pendency.
The petition urged the court to direct Chief Secretaries of States and Union Territories and Directors- General of Police to circulate or inform police stations and officials about the March 2015 verdict. In turn, the State High Courts should bring the judgment to the notice of district courts within their jurisdiction to prevent failures of justice.
Panel concerned at CBI vacancies
House committee says the premier probe agency should not be understaffed
A parliamentary standing committee has raised concern over non-filling of vacancies in the Central Bureau of Investigation, saying it will impact on its performance.
“Increasing number of cases are now being referred to the CBI pertaining to areas like internal security, cybercrimes, corruption, financial irregularities and the nation cannot afford to have its premier investigative agency understaffed and thus ill-prepared,” the committee said in a report tabled in Parliament last Thursday.
The committee said the level of vacant positions in executive rank, law officers and technical officers is about 16, 28 and 56% respectively.
At the top level, out of four posts of Special Director or Additional Director, three are lying vacant.
To overcome the perennial problem of vacancies in the CBI, the committee recommended that the government simplify recruitment rules to overcome the procedural bottlenecks.
“The government may also consider making terms of deputation to the CBI more rewarding in order to retain capable officers and to attract best officers from the State police forces, Central paramilitary forces, Intelligence Bureau, etc.,” the committee recommended.
The Department of Personnel and Training said efforts were on to fill the vacant CBI posts by fine-tuning the recruitment rules.
The committee said though Prime Minister Narendra Modi in 2015 announced setting up of the International Centre of Excellence in Investigation (ICEI-CBI) at the CBI Academy in Ghaziabad, “it is yet to see the light of the day and is still pending at various stages of approval.”
ICEI-CBI was to offer world-class certified courses on investigation and prosecution in specialised and emerging domains of crime including cybercrime.
The committee recommended that the CBI and the government should expedite approvals for setting up the ICEI-CBI centre.
Source- The Hindu
For a FREE DEMO call @ +91-88009-99280/84
Important Tags : Gktoday 2019 & Current affairs in Hindi & English / Today Current affairs / Daily Gk Update / Daily Current affairs / Today Current affairs in Hindi 2019/ Today GK updates / Gktoday 2019